
An Anti-Bullying, Finding our Humanity & Decency Movement

Is "Bullying" just a part of growing up?


"Boys will be boys." We have all heard that before.
It is also said that bullying is just a "rite of passage". Could that be true? Do we pay too much attention to the issue of bullying, making it out to be worse than it really is? Are we coddling our children too much, creating weak youth without the capacity to stand up for themselves?
The evidence seems to indicate just the opposite. All efforts at providing love, protection, empathy, inclusion, and tolerance seem to help children also develop strength and positive outlooks.
Where these things are missing, and, instead, children find neglect, apathy, indifference, and aggression, they tend to develop weaker characters, less resiliency, and a negative outlook on life.
Do you think that this generation lacks strength of character and resiliency? If so, look to the generation that is raising them for at least one of the reasons. It is very often the values and neglect of adults and the greater society that contributes to the weakness in our children.
Bullying defined
To understand the answer to the question above, we must first have a clear understanding of what bullying is.
Bullying involves repetitive or long term behaviors that are damaging to the physical or mental well being of another. The key is that the behavior is repetitive or long term.
Bullying usually involves an imbalance of power. In other words, a stronger individual or group preys upon the weakness, or perceived weakness, of another.
This is unlike normal conflict. Normal conflict can actually be healthy for the individuals involved. Conflict teaches us the tools for healthy social interaction and interpersonal resolution.
Bullying is not interested in healthy outcomes. Rather, the behaviors, by design, are damaging to either the physical well being, or mental well being, or both, of the victim.
Bullying behaviors target the physical well being or mental well being of their targets.
In very general terms, bullying behaviors by boys usually involve physical or verbal aggression. They are more overt in nature.
Bullying behaviors by girls usually are designed to cause mental distress or psychological damage.
This type of bullying involves the destruction of another's reputation and friendships. It is often covert in nature.
In our view at TIES, bullying intended to cause psychological damage is on the rise, while bullying involving
physical aggression is remaining steady in terms of societal percentages of occurrences (within the United States).
This is due in part to social media, creating a new platform for increased psychological bullying. This is also due
to what we perceive to be increasing aggression among school age females.
In both cases, bullying involves the dehumanization of the victim.
In both cases, the victims are usually ostracized. They have either been previously ostracized (therefore, easy targets),
or are ostracized through the bullying process.
Neglect as the predecessor to bullying.
I was talking to an attorney a while back. The gentleman represented school districts throughout the United States and the conversation turned to the subject of bullying, as he was aware of the work I was involved in. He opened up and voiced what many also wonder. He asked if all the attention to bullying was actually more hyperbole than reality. After all, bullying has always existed. Why all the attention now? He went on to tell me how he had also been bullied as a child. When he was younger another boy made his life hell for awhile. He was Jewish in a non-Jewish neighborhood and was constantly teased and harassed by another. The attorney said that he finally got into a physical altercation with the boy and was left alone after that. He felt that the bullying that he endured, and his confrontation with the bully, had helped him develop his character.
I asked him if he grew up with attentive parents. He said that he had. I asked him if he felt that overall he had a good life at home. He again responded, "Yes".
I asked if he had friends at school. Again his answer was yes.
I asked if he felt physically capable of defending himself against the bully. he said, "Yes".
So I asked him to imagine another scenario. To change his circumstances. Imagine if you did not come from a strong family. Imagine from the time you were young not receiving the support and love that strengthened your character and gave you a foundation to go out and have confidence in yourself.
Imagine going to school and not having friends. Feeling alone and vulnerable. Does this now change the equation?
Imagine not being able to physically stand up for yourself. Imagine trying to do so and the outcome being different. Just not having the physical abilities to win that fight. The bully wins and now the bullying becomes worse.
You see, what this attorney experienced was bullying, yes. But, fortunately for him, he had the tools and the support, and the ability, to defend himself. Not all do! And the children who do not have all the same advantages are not at fault.
The second part of his question was if all the attention to bullying in the last few years has only served to make the problem seem larger than it really is.. The answer is no. In fact, the true extent of the problem is greater than most are aware. Bullying is increasing in occurrences as well as severity. Many are now referring to it as the "silent epidemic".
Why does the public not know the true depth of the bullying epidemic and the amount of loss of life of our sons and daughters?
-
The media, as a rule, does not report suicides, or attempted suicides of children and teenagers. So rarely do we see the faces, which are thousands, that would make it real, and wake up the larger population to the extent of the problem
-
The few stories we see are reported over and over again nationwide giving the impression that the stories are few and far between and sensationalized. Meanwhile, we are losing close to 6000 youth a year to suicide, and estimates of over 500000 attempts every year. These numbers are increasing every year and have tripled since 1980.
-
There is a stigma attached to suicide and bullying both. A public conversation is difficult to have.
-
When children do take their lives, the pain the family feels and questions that ensue are very private. Most families choose to deal with their grief and pain privately. They especially do not want the life of their child to be defined by the negative actions others have inflicted on them. And this is completely understandable and right. But it does lend to a less adequate picture of the extent of bullying in our schools.
-
Inadequate accountability by schools. Current laws are such that schools are not to provide public information as to discipline measures taken, or conversations had regarding incidents of bullying. This information is not even shared with the affected party. So if a child is bullied and reports it to the school, he/she will be told that they will take care of it. There is rarely follow up with the child or the parents of the child to ease anxiety and create trust. Bullied children are usually not even told who was talked to and when, let alone results and measures taken. There is no accountability to the child who is bullied, the parents, or the student body. While there are reports that schools are required to submit regarding reports of bullying, evidence shows that the records are not being kept. There is a significant gap between incidents of bullying and school-reported cases of bullying. Despite this gap, and increasing occurrences of bullying, there appears to not be adequate internal or external oversight or follow up. Perhaps there are not adequate resources to provide needed follow up.
-
Often, incidents of bullying are downplayed on campus. The incentive for a school is to dismiss these incidents or to label them differently.
-
There is still a public shaming of these youth, even by adults, on a consistent basis. They are referred to as weak, socially awkward, misfits, etc. In other words, we blame the victim for the behavior of their peers. This only further reinforces in the child’s mind that there is something wrong with them and they deserve to be mistreated and shunned, and verbally abused. So of course they will not open up when they are bullied. Unfortunately, the truth is much different, and the myth that these children are weak is far from the truth.
-
Culture of silence among our youth. Even parents have to work hard hard to get through this wall for much less sensitive subjects.
-
Without adequate safeguards children tend to suffer in silence often for months or years. They believe that if they say something nothing will truly be done, and their situation will only become worse.
-
The subject of bullying goes to a child’s self-worth. Children and teenagers are looking for their identity. To verbalize that their peer group has deemed them “inadequate” or “worthless” is humiliating and shames them and gives form, credence, or life, to the idea that they are not good enough even for common decency. Many children will take their lives, or attempt suicide, after constant prolonged bullying, and yet never let anyone know how hopeless and despondent they have become. The shame and hurt is just too great.
The suicide rate among our youth continues to climb, and many of these suicides are by children who have either been bullied or feel ostracized and neglected by their peers. Right now we are losing approximately 16 youth each day to suicide in the U.S., and that number continues to climb.
News sources do not report youth suicides often for a number of reasons. Privacy being one. Youth suicides occurring under the radar being another. But even when the media is aware they often choose to not report it for a very good reason. We know that when suicides are reported among our youth, often this leads to other youth also attempting to take their lives.
So unless you are personally involved and seeing firsthand what is happening, or you are able to see the facts and figures and the stats, you may not realize the extent of the problem.
A common element in children who are bullied is neglect. Not necessarily by their parents, but by society and peers that surround them.
Bullies prey upon children who they perceive to be weak, or vulnerable. Usually these children are not connected socially within the school environment. They have few if any friends.
They may be different from the group. Viewed as inferior. Their crime may be being overweight, being short, being tall, being not pretty enough, social anxiety, Asperbergers, being too pretty, learning disabilities, physical disabilities, being of a different culture or race, or something else, or nothing at all.
But these children are either ostracized by design, or simply overlooked.
Within the school environment they are neglected by design (by their peers) or simply by omission (by adults).
Of course, if we were more aware, more emotionally intelligent, children would not be disconnected in the school environment. Both adults and other children (through adult's examples) would be inclusive and aware of those around them.
Too many children go to school and if not directly bullied, they are ignored. When they seek to be included, the rejection becomes even more acute and direct. So they learn to keep a low profile and stay in the shadows. Better than the pain of rejection.
Those who spent their school years experiencing rejection, neglect, being invisible, know how this treatment year after year erodes the self-worth of a developing child. They know the pain of neglect, of being invisible.
Here is what we know. The human species thrives on love and dies on neglect. This is true from the time we are born, before even conscious thought is occurring.
Evidence has indicated in the past that orphanage infants were far more likely to die or exhibit emotional detachment than others. Proponents had argued that it didn’t matter whether children had “parents” specially devoted to them at the orphanage, claiming that simply feeding and changing them appropriately would be adequate until adoptive parents were found. Babies, they said, couldn’t remember anyway.
"The harrowing consequences of these theories were most vividly brought to light in Romania in the 1980s and ’90s, when a ban on abortion led to a surge in orphanage babies. The longer these children were left in their cribs, simply being fed and changed without individualized affection, the more damage was seen, even if the orphanage was clean and well-run. Many children developed autistic-like behaviors, repetitively rocking or banging their heads. Some were cold and withdrawn or indiscriminately affectionate; some alternated between these extremes. And they simply didn’t grow like normal infants: their head circumferences were abnormally small and they had problems with attention and comprehension." * Time.com May 24, 2012
Listen carefully to the following clip. The concepts of neglect and its effects, can easily be seen among our children in the institutional settings of schools. While these concepts do not correlate 100% from the baby/parent relationship, still the overlap and the effects seem to parallel quite well.
The Still Face Experiments
In the 1970s, Dr. Edward Tronick, an American developmental psychologist, conducted what has become widely known as the Still Face Experiments.
In these experiments babies received appropriate responses and interaction with their parents and then the parents were instructed to respond to the child with no emotion or appropriate response, maintaining a "still face" despite the babies attempts to illicit some showing of responsiveness and care.

"Babies this young are extremely responsive to the emotions and the reactivity and the social interaction that they get from the world around them. This is something that we started studying 30, 40 years ago when people didn't think that infants could engage in social interaction. In the "still face" experiment what the mother did was she sits down and she's playing with her baby who is about a year of age. And she gives a greeting to the baby, the baby gives a greeting back to her. This baby starts pointing at different places in the world and the mother is trying to engage her and play with her. They're working to coordinate their emotions and their intentions, what they want to do in the world. And that's really what the baby is used to. And then, we asked the mother to not respond to the baby. The baby very quickly picks up on this, and then she uses all of her abilities to try and get the mother back. She smiles at the mother. She points because she's used to the mother looking where she points. The baby puts both hands up in front of her and says, 'What's happening here?' She makes that screechy sound at the mother, like, 'Come on! Why aren't we doing this?' Even in this two minutes when they don't get the normal reaction, they react with negative emotions, they turn away, they feel the stress of it. They actually may lose control of their posture because of the stress they are experiencing. It's a little like the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good is that normal stuff that goes on, that we all do with our kids. The bad is when something bad happens but the infant can overcome it. After all, when you stop the still face, the mother and the baby start to play again. The ugly is when you don't give the child any chance to get back to the good. There's no reparation and they're stuck in that really ugly situation." - Dr. Edward Tronick.
Please read carefully what Dr. Tronick said. At TIES, we believe that the same dynamics are at play between children who are bullied or ostracized, neglected or overlooked, and their peers. If we could conduct the same "still face" experiment on school age children with the greater society surrounding them, the results would be very similar. In fact, we are surrounded by evidence of this everywhere. Except the rejection that these children feel does not last for just two minutes. It often lasts months, or years, or even lifetimes.
Recent studies have found that four-month-old infants, when re-exposed to the Still Face two weeks after the first time, show rapid physiological changes that were not present when they were exposed to it the first time. In other words, the damage becomes more pronounced through repetition.
When society surrounding a child receives the child with, in essence, a "still face", the child will experience confusion, hurt, and will express negative emotions (responses) to what they are experiencing. Because the treatment is often coming from more than just one individual, but a peer group, the child will also experience feelings of inadequacy, worthlessness, lack of trust in others, and hopelessness.
Babies are more honest in their expression of emotions and their expression of their needs. They have not learned to hide their emotions or needs. They have not learned that people can be cold and uncaring. Indifferent. Children who are bullied or neglected learn this and begin to hide their feelings, not because it is healthy or an indicator of strength. They simply do so out of emotional necessity because of the non-responsiveness of their peers and society around them.
When these children express their discomfort and hurt, they are unable to do so maturely. They do not have the tools yet, much like the babies. Too often, their expressions of the hurt they are feeling are met with even worse ridicule and bullying and indifference, even by the adults surrounding them. So children who are bullied start to shut down, even if just for emotional survival. No point in expressing how you are being hurt if you are met with further indifference or told to "suck it up" in essence.
It is not that these children are somehow defective or inferior. It is that society's responses to these children are so often defective and miserable.
Consider this. The attitude that these children should "suck it up" or stop whining...maybe this is just society being weak, not the child. And then transferring the guilt onto the child, so to not feel bad ourselves. Maybe it is wrong to expect a developing child to "suck it up" so that we do not have to look deeper at ourselves or our society. Much easier to find fault with the child. Maybe it is just us being weak.
Being emotionally blind to others does not mean we are strong. More likely, it is an indicator of our own inadequacies, fears, or weaknesses. Empathy is not a weakness. In fact, it is one of the highest forms of intelligence, as it requires a person to see outside of themselves.

ZACronin - One Of Those Days
Shall we get even more honest? This need to be accepted and treated with decency is not limited to our youth. Adults have the same needs but have developed more tools to get their needs met, generally speaking. Adults also are not forced into institutional settings and left to fend for themselves against abusive behavior.
We are able to avoid much of the cruelty others experience by the masks we wear, the image we maintain, seeking to fit in to whatever our social group may be, adopting the attitudes and even the communication patterns of the group.
Social psychologists are well aware of just how much humans are social beings; of how important fitting in is to , yes, even adults.
Still, the lack of love and acceptance, and connection among adults, is the most common source of unhappiness, independent of age.
Em - My Pale Skin
At TIES we have chosen to dedicate ourselves to our children, stopping bullying and teaching emotional intelligence to our youth, as there is something especially terrible when children are torn down before they ever have a chance.
Suck it up? No.
Rite of passage? No.
A normal part of growing up? No.
Indifference and a lack of caring never was strength.
Here is what real strength looks like:
Izzybe.com and Likeurlife.com - It only takes one
USA Today - Boys' reaction to bullying will melt your heart